PROXMOX : Installation de MacOS pour test en mode VM.

Mon installation :

  • OS : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
  • Proxmox : 8.1.3 .
  • Kernel : Linux  6.5.11-4-pve SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC PMX 6.5.11-4 (2023-11-20T10:19Z) x86_64 GNU/Linux

La version que je vise :

  • MacOS Ventura 13.6.3 avec 8 vCPU et 16 Go de RAM. Le vrai test sera de supporter le logiciel RubiTrack qui est assez gourmand.

Les étapes :

# git clone https://github.com/luchina-gabriel/OSX-PROXMOX.git

# /bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://install.osx-proxmox.com)" 

OSX-PROXMOX (Version 20231212T1850) - GABRIEL LUCHINA - https://osx-proxmox.com
 
Prerequisites have not yet been installed and configured on this HOST.
 
Running the prerequisites and at the end your HOST will be rebooted ...
 
... Successfully completed prerequisite process, your HOST will restart within 15s.
 
After rebooting, RUN: osx-setup

Le setup est bien fait :

macOS Ventura
 
Enter the VM ID [or ENTER to automatically generate (128)]: 
 
Enter VM Name [or ENTER for Default: HACK-VENTURA]: 
 
Enter a disk size [INTEGER] [or ENTER for Default: 64 Gb]: 
 
Storages available:
 
     - LVM
     - datastore
     - local
     - local-lvm
 
Enter which storage to create the VM [or ENTER for Default: local-lvm]: datastore
 
Allocate CPU cores [Need Power of 2] [or ENTER for Default: 4]: 4
 
Allocate RAM [MiB] [or ENTER for Default: 4096]: 16000
 
Do you want to download and create the recovery image? [Y/N] [or ENTER for Default: Y]: 
 
Downloading and creating the recovery image for installation ...
Download and recovery created successfully.
 
Creating virtual machine with macOS - Ventura ...
Virtual machine (HACK-VENTURA) created successfully.
 
Access the Proxmox Web Panel to continue with the installation ...

Lancement :

Aie premier problème le disque n’est pas vue, car il est pas IDE. Je fais donc un nouveau disque IDE . Et j’en profite pour augmenter le nombre de CPU :

C’est bon :

Visiblement cela ne va pas plus loin. Cela bloque sur l’installation.

RubiTrack 6.2.3 : Perte de données …

En passant

Je pense que RubiTrack 6.2.3 m’a fait perdre des données … il faut dire que le fichier fait 939,5 Mo. Pour 10152 activités …. mais visiblement j’ai perdu les activités de course à pieds, j’ai plus que 1160 activités.

Pour l’instant je ne sais pas d’ou vient le problème … je vais analyser.

A suivre.

Visiblement j’ai perdu les données du 3 aout 2012 au 10 mars 2012 (50 activités). J’ai pas d’explication pour l’instant.

A suivre.

Migration Rubitrack (MacOS) to Golden Cheetah (Windows) : Test KO.

I try to do migration from Rubitrack to Golden Cheetah :

My Realse of Rubitrack : 5.3.6 :

My file rubitrack5 : 579,8 Mo. I have lot of different activities :

Test 1 : I select all and I do a export TCX :

Result : KO

Test 2 : I select all and I do a export TCX (and i check the box).

Result : KO

The size of file TCX it’s 2,4 Go

# cat Test.tcx | grep "<Activity Sport" | awk '{print $2}' | sort -n | uniq -c
7213 Sport="Other">
1106 Sport="Running">
# du -h Test.tcx
2,4G	Test.tcx
# head -2 Test.tcx 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<TrainingCenterDatabase 
xmlns="http://www.garmin.com/xmlschemas/TrainingCenterDatabase/v2" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.garmin.com/xmlschemas/TrainingCenterDatabase/v2 
http://www.garmin.com/xmlschemas/TrainingCenterDatabasev2.xsd">

1 – I think it’s not works because it’s not one file by activity.

2 – Normaly I must see ‘biking’, ‘running’, ‘hiking’, ‘walking’ and ‘swimming’  …. I see only Other & Running. If you see https://www8.garmin.com/xmlschemas/TrainingCenterDatabasev2.xsd :

<xsd:element name="Running" type="HistoryFolder_t"/>
<xsd:element name="Biking" type="HistoryFolder_t"/>
<xsd:element name="Other" type="HistoryFolder_t"/>
<xsd:element name="MultiSport" type="MultiSportFolder_t"/>
<xsd:element name="Extensions" type="Extensions_t" minOccurs="0">

I try also to import the TCX to Garmin (who develop the TCX format) : KO.

The Release of Base Camp it’s Version 4.8.11 (4.8.11).

So I think it’s bad format .… I do a post on forum : https://forum.rubitrack.com/viewtopic.php?p=12551#p12551 

I use Rubitrack since : Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:52 pm … but for me the most important on all application it’s to have a perfect import/export. My data it’s my property !  So I’m not very happy …

MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017) : Test Blender Benchmark sur Big Sur

Voici le résultat du test :

{
"benchmark_client": {
"client_version": "1.0b2"
},
"blender_version": {
"build_commit_date": "2018-03-22",
"build_commit_time": "14:10",
"build_date": "2018-03-22",
"build_hash": "f4dc9f9",
"build_time": "21:48:25",
"version": "2.79 (sub 0)"
},
"device_info": {
"compute_devices": [
"Intel Core i7-7820HQ CPU @ 2.90GHz"
],
"device_type": "CPU",
"num_cpu_threads": 8
},
"scenes": [
{
"name": "barbershop_interior",
"stats": {
"device_memory_usage": 2341.5,
"device_peak_memory": 2341.58,
"pipeline_render_time": 2946.86,
"render_time_no_sync": 2896.97,
"result": "OK",
"total_render_time": 2945.8
}
},
{
"name": "bmw27",
"stats": {
"device_memory_usage": 140.55,
"device_peak_memory": 140.56,
"pipeline_render_time": 580.22,
"render_time_no_sync": 574.657,
"result": "OK",
"total_render_time": 578.833
}
},
{
"name": "classroom",
"stats": {
"device_memory_usage": 295.71,
"device_peak_memory": 295.77,
"pipeline_render_time": 1909.69,
"render_time_no_sync": 1907.64,
"result": "OK",
"total_render_time": 1908.78
}
},
{
"name": "fishy_cat",
"stats": {
"device_memory_usage": 465.3,
"device_peak_memory": 466.65,
"pipeline_render_time": 860.63,
"render_time_no_sync": 849.711,
"result": "OK",
"total_render_time": 859.406
}
},
{
"name": "koro",
"stats": {
"device_memory_usage": 449.47,
"device_peak_memory": 473.3,
"pipeline_render_time": 1205.35,
"render_time_no_sync": 1192.2,
"result": "OK",
"total_render_time": 1205.08
}
},
{
"name": "pavillon_barcelona",
"stats": {
"device_memory_usage": 150.43,
"device_peak_memory": 150.44,
"pipeline_render_time": 1482.2,
"render_time_no_sync": 1478.99,
"result": "OK",
"total_render_time": 1479.97
}
}
],
"system_info": {
"bitness": "64bit",
"cpu_brand": "Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU @ 2.90GHz",
"devices": [
{
"name": "Intel Core i7-7820HQ CPU @ 2.90GHz",
"type": "CPU"
},
{
"name": "Intel HD Graphics 630",
"type": "OPENCL"
},
{
"name": "AMD Radeon Pro 560 Compute Engine",
"type": "OPENCL"
}
],
"machine": "x86_64",
"num_cpu_cores": 4,
"num_cpu_sockets": 1,
"num_cpu_threads": 8,
"system": "Darwin"
},
"timestamp": "2021-06-11T12:48:21.823185+00:00"
}

Mon précédent test : https://www.cyber-neurones.org/2019/12/macos-macbook-pro-15-inch-2017-benchmark-avec-blender/ . Il y a une perte de performance …. Misère.